Stipulated Judgment ¶64 — No Upward Modification of Spousal Support Amount
Source: Stipulated Judgment, FL-180 Attachment, IRMO Nibley Case No. 20FL010940C, entered June 17, 2022.
Summary
The court’s jurisdiction to increase Jennifer’s monthly spousal support above $1,406 — at any time and for any reason — is forever terminated. Charles retains the right to request a downward modification.
When to use
Hard jurisdictional bar against any upward modification of spousal support. Pair with ¶63 (Jennifer’s waiver of Vomacka / Brown / Ousterman extensions) for the complete jurisdictional picture. Together they establish that no court has jurisdiction (a) to increase the $1,406 amount or (b) to extend the obligation past 1/31/2025.
Paragraph text (verbatim)
¶64. The court’s jurisdiction to increase the amount of spousal support payable by Charles to Jennifer from $1,406 per month to any greater amount, at any time and for any reason, is forever terminated. This provision shall not limit Charles’ ability to request a downward modification of spousal support.
Scope / notes
- Absolute, time-and-reason-unlimited jurisdictional bar against upward modification.
- Downward modification by Charles is expressly preserved (though by 4/2026 the obligation has terminated by ¶58’s date trigger anyway).
- Combined with ¶65 (Jennifer’s waiver of any modification request) and ¶63 (Vomacka / Brown / Ousterman waiver), no avenue exists to increase or extend the $1,406 amount.
Linked exhibits
Transclude of Exhibits-by-Statute.base